Facility Management experts : how to face contemporary challenges?

By outsourcing activities that previously fell under their general services, organizations impose much higher demands on Facility Management actors than they were satisfied with internally or when directly managing multiple service providers. These demands notably concern the responsiveness of service providers, responsibility management, and, unsurprisingly, cost control.

• Responsiveness to needs/intervention requests

Intervention times are, of course, specified in all service contracts, and the service provider is judged based on its ability to meet these times in urgent cases (leak, breakdown, malfunction). To meet this responsiveness requirement, hard FM companies focus on prevention through scheduled maintenance visits. Increasingly, they also place the installations and technical networks they manage under continuous monitoring (detectors, sensors, video) to be immediately alerted in case of an incident or malfunction.

Whether the alert is raised by such a device or by a person, the main difficulty is being able to dispatch professionals on-site who can resolve the identified problem in a single intervention within the contractual deadlines and compatible with the potential risks (to the building or its occupants).

It is still necessary that technicians with the appropriate skills, certifications, and/or authorizations are actually available. Given the diversity of trades and specialties that may be called upon for emergencies, the ability to precisely (pre)qualify the problem and the visibility of the schedules of the relevant technicians are essential conditions for effectively managing unplanned interventions – whether the service provider has dedicated emergency and contingency teams or each specialized technician’s schedule includes slots reserved for unplanned interventions.

• Traceability of responsibilities

Delegating to a Facility Management company the management of services without which the contracting organization cannot function implies a clear establishment of responsibilities in increasingly broad areas, including social and environmental responsibility. As the employer of intervention personnel, the primary responsibility of the service provider is to ensure that its technical staff possesses all the required qualifications and authorizations to carry out the interventions assigned to them.

As precisely as the respective commitments of the client and the service provider are defined in contractual documents, the service provider must be able to justify its actions and decisions, particularly those concerning technical interventions. This implies integrated information systems and systematic reporting of field data ensuring total traceability of activities. Only this end-to-end traceability makes it possible to demonstrate that all maintenance operations listed in the contract have been duly executed, that unplanned interventions do not result from negligence, and that each was carried out within the deadlines and standards, with parts and materials compliant with current regulations.

What is at stake here is the legal protection of the company and its employees (and any subcontractors). It is also, it should be noted, the ability to invoice any service not provided for in the contract but necessary for the safety and proper functioning of the client’s facilities.

• Cost control

By turning to Facility Management, clients intend to benefit from high-level services while significantly reducing their operating expenses. To meet this requirement, the main lever for FM service providers is the pooling of technical resources and intervention personnel. However, in a context where client purchasing departments are always negotiating downwards, Facility Management actors can only truly protect their margin by streamlining their organization and maximizing the occupancy rate of their intervention personnel, especially the specialized technicians on whom the value proposition of multi-technical service providers depends.

In a cost and resource control perspective, site intervention planning and optimization software is all the more essential as it allows smoothing the activity of itinerant technicians and maximizing the number of interventions they can carry out each day without spending more time on the road. The deployment of these tools translates into the ability to establish realistic schedules and routes – taking into account the actual duration of tasks to be performed at each client and the travel times between sites on the same route. These optimized routes are crucial for retaining professionals with the most in-demand technical skills today (electrical engineering and HVAC trades, IoT specialists, etc.). These professionals are also legitimately seeking solutions that allow them to work safely when working alone and mobile applications that take into account the specificities of their trade and reduce the time required for administrative tasks (intervention reports, quotes, etc.).

By optimizing the use of their resources – both human and material – and controlling their own operational costs, Facility Management actors can today resist the pressure clients put on prices. What allows us to affirm this? Quite simply, the soft and hard Facility Management companies that Nomadia has long supported. By deploying our sectorization, route optimization, field intervention planning software, and equipping their employees with our mobile business applications and PTI solutions, these companies increase the productivity of their teams by 20% or more and reduce mileage accordingly – without compromising the quality of service expected by their clients and the working conditions offered to their employees.